13.4.04
The Telegraph
(Filed: 11/04/2004)
**Here is the Pot calling the Kettle black
US tactics condemned by British officers
By Sean Rayment, Defence Correspondent
Senior British commanders have condemned American military tactics in Iraq
as heavy-handed and disproportionate.
One senior Army officer told The Telegraph that America's aggressive methods
were causing friction among allied commanders and that there was a growing
sense of "unease and frustration" among the British high command.
The officer, who agreed to the interview on the condition of anonymity, said
that part of the problem was that American troops viewed Iraqis as
untermenschen - the Nazi expression for "sub-humans".
Speaking from his base in southern Iraq, the officer said: "My view and the
view of the British chain of command is that the Americans' use of violence
is not proportionate and is over-responsive to the threat they are facing.
They don't see the Iraqi people the way we see them. They view them as
untermenschen. They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the
British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's awful.
"The US troops view things in very simplistic terms. It seems hard for them
to reconcile subtleties between who supports what and who doesn't in Iraq.
It's easier for their soldiers to group all Iraqis as the bad guys. As far as
they are concerned Iraq is bandit country and everybody is out to kill them."
The phrase untermenschen - literally "under-people" - was brought to
prominence by Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf, published in 1925. He used the
term to describe those he regarded as racially inferior: Jews, Slaves and
gipsies.
Although no formal complaints have as yet been made to their American
counterparts, the officer said the British Government was aware of its commanders'
"concerns and fears".
The officer explained that, under British military rules of war, British
troops would never be given clearance to carry out attacks similar to those
being conducted by the US military, in which
helicopter gunships have been used to fire on targets in urban areas.
British rules of engagement only allow troops to open fire when attacked,
using the minimum force necessary and only at identified targets.
The American approach was markedly different: "When US troops are attacked
with mortars in Baghdad, they use mortar-locating radar to find the firing
point and then attack the general area with artillery, even though the area they
are attacking may be in the middle of a densely populated residential area.
"They may well kill the terrorists in the barrage but they will also kill
and maim innocent civilians. That has been their response on a number of
occasions. It is trite, but American troops do shoot first and ask questions later.
They are very concerned about taking casualties and have even trained their
guns on
British troops, which has led to some confrontations between soldiers.
"The British response in Iraq has been much softer. During and after the war
the British set about trying to win the confidence of the local population.
There have been problems, it hasn't been easy but on the whole it was
succeeding."
The officer believed that America had now lost the military initiative in
Iraq, and it could only be regained with carefully planned, precision attacks
against the "terrorists".
"The US will have to abandon the sledgehammer-to-crack-a-nut approach - it
has failed," he said. "They need to stop viewing every Iraqi, every Arab as
the enemy and attempt to win the hearts and minds of the people.
"Our objective is to create a stable, democratic and safe Iraq. That's
achievable but not in the short term. It is going to take up to 10 years."
--
NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL
Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgebühr: http://www.gmx.net/info
(Filed: 11/04/2004)
**Here is the Pot calling the Kettle black
US tactics condemned by British officers
By Sean Rayment, Defence Correspondent
Senior British commanders have condemned American military tactics in Iraq
as heavy-handed and disproportionate.
One senior Army officer told The Telegraph that America's aggressive methods
were causing friction among allied commanders and that there was a growing
sense of "unease and frustration" among the British high command.
The officer, who agreed to the interview on the condition of anonymity, said
that part of the problem was that American troops viewed Iraqis as
untermenschen - the Nazi expression for "sub-humans".
Speaking from his base in southern Iraq, the officer said: "My view and the
view of the British chain of command is that the Americans' use of violence
is not proportionate and is over-responsive to the threat they are facing.
They don't see the Iraqi people the way we see them. They view them as
untermenschen. They are not concerned about the Iraqi loss of life in the way the
British are. Their attitude towards the Iraqis is tragic, it's awful.
"The US troops view things in very simplistic terms. It seems hard for them
to reconcile subtleties between who supports what and who doesn't in Iraq.
It's easier for their soldiers to group all Iraqis as the bad guys. As far as
they are concerned Iraq is bandit country and everybody is out to kill them."
The phrase untermenschen - literally "under-people" - was brought to
prominence by Adolf Hitler in his book Mein Kampf, published in 1925. He used the
term to describe those he regarded as racially inferior: Jews, Slaves and
gipsies.
Although no formal complaints have as yet been made to their American
counterparts, the officer said the British Government was aware of its commanders'
"concerns and fears".
The officer explained that, under British military rules of war, British
troops would never be given clearance to carry out attacks similar to those
being conducted by the US military, in which
helicopter gunships have been used to fire on targets in urban areas.
British rules of engagement only allow troops to open fire when attacked,
using the minimum force necessary and only at identified targets.
The American approach was markedly different: "When US troops are attacked
with mortars in Baghdad, they use mortar-locating radar to find the firing
point and then attack the general area with artillery, even though the area they
are attacking may be in the middle of a densely populated residential area.
"They may well kill the terrorists in the barrage but they will also kill
and maim innocent civilians. That has been their response on a number of
occasions. It is trite, but American troops do shoot first and ask questions later.
They are very concerned about taking casualties and have even trained their
guns on
British troops, which has led to some confrontations between soldiers.
"The British response in Iraq has been much softer. During and after the war
the British set about trying to win the confidence of the local population.
There have been problems, it hasn't been easy but on the whole it was
succeeding."
The officer believed that America had now lost the military initiative in
Iraq, and it could only be regained with carefully planned, precision attacks
against the "terrorists".
"The US will have to abandon the sledgehammer-to-crack-a-nut approach - it
has failed," he said. "They need to stop viewing every Iraqi, every Arab as
the enemy and attempt to win the hearts and minds of the people.
"Our objective is to create a stable, democratic and safe Iraq. That's
achievable but not in the short term. It is going to take up to 10 years."
--
NEU : GMX Internet.FreeDSL
Ab sofort DSL-Tarif ohne Grundgebühr: http://www.gmx.net/info
